CalWORKs Homeless Families Project in Los Angeles
The Los Angeles Board of Supervisors established an interagency project to serve homeless families in which a parent had mental health problems (HCFP). Families must be eligible for CalWORKs.
The final evaluation report was published in June 2009 but should be read in conjunction with the December 2008 report as both summarized the final outcomes but use different data sources to do so.
Outcomes of MH/SA/DV Services In Los Angeles
In 2003 CiMH was asked by the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health to develop a system to monitor client outcomes in the CalWORKs program. The system developed focused on substance abuse (SA) treatment and domestic violence (DV) services as well as mental health (MH) treatment. The primary outcomes are completing services and finding employment. But transitional steps (such as job training) and clinical outcomes are also documented.
The most recent report, published in July 2007, proposes a large-scale demonstration project to test reforms that the study has indicated might improve outcomes.
Improving Mental Health Outcomes for CalWORKs Participants in Los Angeles County
The third set of reports was published in August of 2006; domestic violence services were not included.
Year Two. Four reports present the findings of the second year of monitoring the effects of providing MH/SA and DV services to CalWORKs participants in Los Angeles. There is a report on mental health, one on substance abuse, and one on domestic violence. A shorter Policy Implications report summarizes the results of all three domains for policy-makers. There is also a two page summary of the Policy Implications report.
Year One. Mental health, substance abuse and domestic violence each have a section in this initial report on Los Angeles outcomes of service. A detailed description of the methodology employed is also available.
The Original Calworks Project: Consequences of MH/AOD/DV for Employment and Child-Well being.
Policy Briefs
Peer-reviewed publications
Three peer-reviewed articles describe the effects of MH/AOD and DV among CalWORKs participants in Kern County and Stanislaus County. These are the only reports in which findings from all three years of the research interviews are included.
Here are the citations:
Meisel, J., Chandler, D., & Rienzi, B. (2003). Domestic violence prevalence and effects on employment in two California TANF populations. Violence Against Women, 9(10), 1191-1213.
Chandler, D., Meisel, J., Jordan, P., Rienzi, B. M., & Goodwin, S. N. (2004). Substance abuse, employment and welfare tenure. Social Service Review, 78(4), 628-651.
Chandler, D., Meisel, J., Jordan, P., Rienzi, B. M., & Goodwin, S. N. (2005). Mental health, employment and welfare tenure. Journal of Community Psychology, Forthcoming.
Click on the links below to view pre-publication drafts of these articles.
Earlier reports regarding different aspects of the two-county study
The report cover is also available as a separate download.
Six County Study on Best and Promising Practices
Other CalWORKs Project Resources
Newsletters
- Help Connections Newsletter, Vol. 1, January, 1999
In this Issue:
- Time & Distance Factors Substantially Affect Identification and Referral for AOD/MH/DV Services
- Content/Environment and Attitude Appear to Have a Direct Effect on Identification of AOD/MH/DV Needs
- The Variety in TANF Participants and in their AOD/MH/DV Issues Suggests that Different Approaches to Identification and Referral will be Useful
- Successful Implementation of Supportive Services under CalWORKs Requires Attention to
- Help Connections Newsletter, Vol. 2, June, 1999
In this Issue:
- Flexibility in the Design and Delivery of Alcohol and Other Drugs, Mental Health, and Domestic Abuse (AOD/MH/DV) Services is Essential
- Solving Specific Problems that Require Interagency Coordination Can Consume Much Time and Resources, But Is a Necessary Investment
- More Attention Needs to be Paid to Job Upgrading and Job Retention
- Working with Clients with Very Difficult Multiple Barriers Requires a More Comprehensive Approach
- AOD and MH Agencies Need to Do More to Create Referrals
- Better Linkages Need to be Paid to Job Upgrading and Job Retention
- Working with Clients with Very Difficult Multiple Barriers Requires a More Comprehensive Approach
- AOD and MH Agencies Need to Do More to Create Referrals
- Better Linkages Need to be Forged Between CalWORKs and Child Welfare
- Special Attention Needs to be Paid to Factors that Impede the Identification of AOD Problems
- Help Connections Newsletter, Vol. 3, December, 1999
In this Issue:
- Complexity of CalWORKs Rules and Regulations
- Low Numbers of Referrals, Unspent Funds
- Need to Learn More about Sanctioned and Exempt Populations
- Engaging Recipients Appropriately
- Providing Employment-Related Services to Participants who are Receiving Extensive MH, AOD, or DV Services
- Serving the Whole Family
- Help Connections Newsletter, Vol. 4, August, 2000
In this Issue:
- AOD/MH/DV Program Staff Report that CalWORKs Clients Experience Positive Change with Services
- AOD/MH/DV Clients Report that Services Are Helpful
- CalWORKs Staff Report AOD/MH/DV Services are Helpful IF they are Completed
- Special Efforts Are Needed to Keep Clients Engaged in AOD/MH/DV Services
- Help Connections Newsletter, Vol. 5, September, 2000
In this Issue:
- Perspective of CalWORKs Staff on How CalWORKs Has Changed Their Jobs
- Training of CalWORKs Staff about AOD/MH/DV Issues
- Influences on CalWORKs Referral Rates
- Implications: How to Help Eligibility Workers and Employment Counselors Make More Referrals
- Help Connections Newsletter, Vol. 6, December, 2000
In this Issue:
- "Back-Door" Referrals from AOD/MH/DV Providers
- Reaching Out to CalWORKs and CalWORKs-Eligible Participants: Media Campaigns and Outreach Workers
- Co-locating AOD/MH/DV Staff -- What to Consider
- Help Connections Newsletter, Vol. 7, April, 2001
In this Issue:
- Many CalWORKs Participants Are Non-Compliant or Sanctioned
- A Higher Percentage of the Sanctioned Face AOD/MH/DV and Other Hurdles
- Counties Are Designing Programs to Reduce Non-Compliance and Sanctioning